SIX overhauls regulatory standards for listing

•

Share on:

SIX Exchange Regulation, the regulatory body of the main Swiss stock exchange, has confirmed plans to overhaul its regulatory listing standards. The sub-division into Main Standard and Domestic Standard will be abolished and issuers may choose between an International and a National or Swiss Standard. The only major difference between the two new regimes will be the applicable financial reporting standard. IFRS or US GAAP must be used on the International Standard. Issuers who do not wish to report under either of these two standards, but opt for Swiss GAAP FER instead, will be listed on the National Standard. The changes are planned to become effective on 1 July 2015.

By Thomas U. Reutter (Reference: CapLaw-2015-1)

SIX Exchange Regulation, the regulatory body of the main SIX Swiss Exchange Ltd. (SIX), will overhaul its regulatory listing standards. The changes contemplated by SIX are not a response to a revised regulatory framework. Although Swiss primary market regulation is poised for fundamental change of paradigm in light of the planned Financial Services Act (FinSA), the amendments discussed herein have been prompted by pressure on the part of issuers. In fact, many issuers listed on the Main Standard have come to perceive their reporting under IFRS as too costly and burdensome. As a result, some of them have decided to opt for a standard that is perceived less stringent – Swiss GAAP FER. These companies not only include local firms but also the big and international watch manufacturer Swatch.

Swiss GAAP FER is not Swiss GAAP. Swiss GAAP is a set of mandatory minimum rules for accounting of Swiss corporates set forth in the Swiss Code of Obligations. It does not aim to provide a “true and fair view”, but advocates a prudent accounting favoring creditor protection. Swiss GAAP FER, by contrast, is a set of accounting and reporting recommendations promulgated by a committee of experts with a view to providing a “true and fair view” of the financial situation and the results of operations. In this respect, Swiss GAAP FER is comparable to IFRS or US GAAP, but remains more principle based and much less detailed and prescriptive. Issuers listed on the current Domestic Standard may report under Swiss GAAP FER. By contrast, issuers listed on the Main Standard are precluded from doing so, but have to use IFRS or US GAAP instead.

Currently, an issuer listed on the Main Standard who wishes to report according to Swiss GAAP FER instead of IFRS would have to change to the Domestic Standard.  Such a change would obviously come with a price, be it only the likely perception among the investor community of having downsized from a global to a local player. It is no surprise, therefore, that issuers tried and try to challenge such a “relegation”. SIX has come up with a proposal to solve the problem in October 2014. It proposed a new conceptual framework for listing standards and conducted a hearing with interested parties. According to a report published on 11 December 2014, the hearing showed largely positive feedback to the proposed changes.

The new concept is based on two new distinct listing standards whose main differentiator is the issuer’s reporting standard. There will be an international reporting standard (comparable to the current Main Standard) and a national or “Swiss” reporting standard. The latter, however, is much different from the current Domestic Standard. In fact, the minimum equity and minimum free float requirements of the National Standard will be the same as for the International Standard. Issuers wishing to list on the National Standard will therefore have to satisfy significantly higher thresholds than the issuers on the current Domestic Standard.

The following table gives on overview of the requirements in the two new standards compared to the status quo (source SIX Swiss Regulation: http://www.six-exchange-
regulation.com/download/regulation/vernehmlassung/presentation_consultation_20141009_en.pdf
(visited on 19 February 2015)):

CapLaw-2015-1

In addition, SIX will also overhaul the regulatory listing standards regarding debt securities. Currently, debt securities have an own listing regime, but are listed according to the Main Standard. The new concept will consider the different listing requirements and will provide three standards (Standard for Bonds, Standard for Derivatives and Standard for Exchange Traded Products). However, the changes are of formal nature and the listing requirements for debt securities remain the same.

SIX is currently adapting the various levels of the regulation framework to reflect the proposed new concept. The changes are planned to come into force on 1 July 2015.

Thomas U. Reutter (thomas.reutter@baerkarrer.ch)

Discover more articles

We provide up-to-date information on legal and regulatory developments regarding the capital markets, publish concise articles on developments in the Swiss and international financial markets, and announce recent deals and forthcoming events.

  • FinSA Conduct Obligations: FINMA‘sRecent Enforcement Activity

    FINMA has intensified its enforcement of the conduct obligations governing individual financial services under the Financial Services Act (FinSA). The publicly communicated conclusions of two recent enforcement proceedings are good examples of interventions by the regulator under the FinSA conduct regime. Accompanied by FINMA Guidance 03/2026, which highlights recurring risk patterns, these cases signal that the conduct obligations are now firmly on FINMA‘s enforcement radar.


  • KAPITALMARKTRECHT IM FOKUS 2026 – CONFERENCE REPORT | 19 August 2026, SIX ConventionPoint, Zurich

    On 19 August 2026, practitioners, academics and market participants convened at SIX ConventionPoint in Zurich for Kapitalmarktrecht im Fokus 2026. Under the Title “Clarity or Room for Interpretation? Challenges in Interpreting Bond Terms and Conditions“ (Klarheit oder Auslegungsspielraum? Herausforderungen bei der Interpretation von Anleihensbedingungen), the conference examined how standardized bond terms should be interpreted, the interaction between contractual provisions and regulatory requirements and the significance of prospectuses, risk factors and changing market practice. Particular attention was paid to regulatory capital instruments and the Point of Non-Viability (PONV), against the background of the write-down of Credit Suisse AT1 instruments and the…


  • EHRA CLARIFIES REGISTRATION PRACTICE FOR CONDITIONAL CAPITAL WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE CAPITAL BAND 

    In a practice note dated 27 August 2026, the Federal Commercial Register Office (EHRA) clarified the registration practice applicable where a company‘s articles of association provide for conditional capital both within a capital band and outside the capital band. This article sets out the resulting registration practice.


  • Swiss advisers subject to the Swiss Anti-Money Laundering Act: Scope and Duties

    Effective 1 October 2026, the revised Swiss Anti-Money Laundering Act will extend Switzerland‘s anti-money laundering framework to advisers participating professionally in covered transactions. Lawyers, notaries, fiduciaries, accountants, tax advisers, M&A advisers and other professionals may become subject to due-diligence, organizational and certain reporting requirements under the AML framework even if they do not execute financial transactions themselves. This article summarizes the new regime, its principal exemptions and its consequences for professional advisers.


  • The Impact of Article 21c CRD VI on Swiss Banks‘ Loan Portfolios

    Effective as of 11 January 2027, CRD VI introduces an EU-wide restriction on third-country institutions‘ cross-border lending activities. Under the new article 21c CRD VI, Swiss banks may no longer extend loans, provide guarantees, or make credit commitments to EU-domiciled borrowers without an authorized subsidiary or branch in the relevant member state. The prohibition covers all corporate finance activities with an EU nexus, including syndicated credit facilities.


  • DocMorris Finance B.V.‘s Issuance of CHF 96.8 Million Senior Guaranteed Convertible Bonds Due 2031 and Concurrent Repurchase of Outstanding Convertible Bonds Due 2028

    On 11 September 2026, DocMorris Finance B.V., a directly wholly-owned subsidiary of DocMorris AG (SIX: DOCM), successfully completed the private placement of CHF 96.8 million 1.5 per cent. senior unsecured convertible bonds due 16 March 2031, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by DocMorris AG and convertible into existing and/or newly issued registered shares of DocMorris AG. Concurrently with the new issuance, DocMorris AG completed the full repurchase of its outstanding 3.0 per cent. convertible bonds due August 2028 with a nominal amount of CHF 49.6 million through privately negotiated bilateral transactions. The repurchased bonds will be cancelled. The transaction reduced the…