Untrue or Incomplete Information in Offer Prospectus

•

Share on:

On 22 November 2017, the Swiss Takeover Board issued a ruling regarding untrue or incomplete information with respect to the offeror contained in the offer prospectus published by HNA in connection with the public tender offer for all shares in gategroup.

By Hans-Jakob Diem / Andreas Hinsen (Reference: CapLaw-2018-32)

 

1) Public Tender Offer for gategroup Holding Ltd.

On 11 April 2015, HNA Aviation (Hong Kong) Air Catering Holding Co., Ltd., Hong Kong (HNA) published the pre-announcement of its public tender offer (Offer) for all publicly held shares of gategroup Holding Ltd, Kloten, Switzerland (gategroup). The offer prospectus (the Offer Prospectus) was published on 20 May 2016.

The offer price was set at CHF 53.00 in cash for each registered share of gategroup and the Offer allowed for dividend payments in the aggregate amount of CHF 0.30 as was resolved by the ordinary general meeting of gategroup in April 2016. The Offer was, inter alia, subject to a minimum acceptance level of 67% as well as approval by all competent merger control authorities or expiry of the applicable waiting periods.

The initial acceptance period was open until 1 July 2016, with the additional acceptance period ending on 21 July 2016. On 22 July 2016, HNA published the definitive final result according to which, after the additional acceptance period, 96.1% of all gategroup shares were held by HNA. However, due to outstanding merger control approvals, completion of the Offer had to be postponed to the end of the third or beginning of the fourth quarter 2016. By ruling dated 18 November 2016, the Swiss Takeover Board granted an additional extension to complete the Offer until 31 December 2016. In the meantime, the tendered gategroup shares were traded on a separate trading line.

Finally, after all required approvals were obtained, on 20 December 2016, the separate trading line for the tendered gategroup shares was closed and the settlement (i.e. payment of the offer price) occurred on 22 December 2016.

2) Shareholders of HNA according to the Offer Prospectus

As required under Swiss takeover law, the Offer Prospectus contained the following description of the shareholders directly or indirectly controlling HNA:

“[HNA] is an indirectly controlled subsidiary of HNA Aviation. […] HNA Aviation is directly held and controlled by HNA Group. HNA Group is directly and indirectly controlled by Hainan Airlines Company Limited Employees Union Committee (HNA Employees Union) and Hainan Province Cihang Foundation (Cihang Foundation), which together own approximately 70.25% ownership interest in HNA Group. […] HNA Employees Union indirectly owns approximately 47.50% of HNA Group. […] Cihang Foundation indirectly owns approximately 22.75% of HNA Group. Bharat Bhisé […] indirectly owns approximately 17.40% of HNA Group. Jun Guan […] indirectly owns approximately 12.35% of HNA Group.”

Summarizing the above, HNA was, according to the information published in the Offer Prospectus indirectly controlled by HNA Employees Union (47.50%), Cihang Foundation (22.75%), Bharat Bhisé (17.40%) and Jun Guan (12.35%).

3) Subsequent Financial Times Articles

In a Financial Times article which was published on 2 June 2017 with the title “Who owns HNA, China’s most aggressive dealmaker?”, the ownership structure of HNA Group was described somewhat differently. According to this article, and by making reference to Chinese corporate filings, 13 individuals – all except one members of the top management of HNA Group – held together 76% of HNA Group. In particular, Chen Feng and Wang Jian each supposedly held 15% and Jun Guan approximately 29% in HNA.

Upon learning of this article, and in light of the possible untrue or incomplete information on the shareholders of HNA contained in the Offer Prospectus, the Swiss Takeover Board requested HNA on 12 July 2017 to comment on this Financial Times article. On 24 July 2017, HNA published its then current ownership structure, stating that, inter alia, Chen Feng and Wang Jian each hold 14.98%, Hainan Cihang Charity Foundation holds 29.5% and Hainan Procinve Cihang Foundation holds 22.75% in HNA (in each case indirectly).

In an additional article published by the Financial Times on 25 July 2017, the CEO of HNA Group, Tan Xiangdong, was quoted as follows: “The [29.%] stake is [HNA’s] own stake. For the whole time, [Mr Guan and Mr Bhisé] had just held the stake for us. That’s why I can move the shares”. After a further exchange of information between HNA and the Swiss Takeover Board, HNA confirmed on 19 October 2017 that (i) Bharat Bhisé and Jun Guan were acting as nominee shareholders and (ii) in December 2015 a 47.5% interest in HNA Group was transferred from Hainan Airlines Company Limited Employees Union Committee to Chen Feng, Wang Jian, Tan Xiangdong, Li Xianhua, Li Qing and Chen Wenli (together the Co-Founders) based on a share option scheme concluded in 2008.

4) Ruling by the Takeover Board

In its ruling dated 22 November 2017, the Swiss Takeover Board concluded that the Offer Prospectus contained untrue or incomplete information on the ownership of HNA, in particular since Bharat Bhisé and Jun Guan were acting as nominee shareholders and the Co-Founders should have been disclosed as group controlling HNA. Since the Offer was already closed in December 2016, i.e. almost one year since the date of this ruling, the Swiss Takeover Board did not require HNA to publish an updated version of the Offer Prospectus. In addition, Ernst & Young AG was mandated to confirm whether the Co-Founders as well as Bharat Bhisé and Jun Guan complied with the minimum price rule and the best price rule. However, the Swiss Takeover Board explicitly stated that (i) due to the lack of a legal basis no fine would be imposed but (ii) it would inform FINMA and the Disclosure Office of SIX Exchange Regulation of this ruling. It should be noted that untrue or incomplete information in the report of the board of directors of the target would be subject to a fine of up to CHF 500,000 under applicable Swiss takeover laws.

Hans-Jakob Diem (hans-jakob.diem@lenzstaehelin.com)
Andreas Hinsen (andreas.hinsen@lenzstaehelin.com)

Discover more articles

We provide up-to-date information on legal and regulatory developments regarding the capital markets, publish concise articles on developments in the Swiss and international financial markets, and announce recent deals and forthcoming events.

  • FinSA Conduct Obligations: FINMA‘sRecent Enforcement Activity

    FINMA has intensified its enforcement of the conduct obligations governing individual financial services under the Financial Services Act (FinSA). The publicly communicated conclusions of two recent enforcement proceedings are good examples of interventions by the regulator under the FinSA conduct regime. Accompanied by FINMA Guidance 03/2026, which highlights recurring risk patterns, these cases signal that the conduct obligations are now firmly on FINMA‘s enforcement radar.


  • KAPITALMARKTRECHT IM FOKUS 2026 – CONFERENCE REPORT | 19 August 2026, SIX ConventionPoint, Zurich

    On 19 August 2026, practitioners, academics and market participants convened at SIX ConventionPoint in Zurich for Kapitalmarktrecht im Fokus 2026. Under the Title “Clarity or Room for Interpretation? Challenges in Interpreting Bond Terms and Conditions“ (Klarheit oder Auslegungsspielraum? Herausforderungen bei der Interpretation von Anleihensbedingungen), the conference examined how standardized bond terms should be interpreted, the interaction between contractual provisions and regulatory requirements and the significance of prospectuses, risk factors and changing market practice. Particular attention was paid to regulatory capital instruments and the Point of Non-Viability (PONV), against the background of the write-down of Credit Suisse AT1 instruments and the…


  • EHRA CLARIFIES REGISTRATION PRACTICE FOR CONDITIONAL CAPITAL WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE CAPITAL BAND 

    In a practice note dated 27 August 2026, the Federal Commercial Register Office (EHRA) clarified the registration practice applicable where a company‘s articles of association provide for conditional capital both within a capital band and outside the capital band. This article sets out the resulting registration practice.


  • Swiss advisers subject to the Swiss Anti-Money Laundering Act: Scope and Duties

    Effective 1 October 2026, the revised Swiss Anti-Money Laundering Act will extend Switzerland‘s anti-money laundering framework to advisers participating professionally in covered transactions. Lawyers, notaries, fiduciaries, accountants, tax advisers, M&A advisers and other professionals may become subject to due-diligence, organizational and certain reporting requirements under the AML framework even if they do not execute financial transactions themselves. This article summarizes the new regime, its principal exemptions and its consequences for professional advisers.


  • The Impact of Article 21c CRD VI on Swiss Banks‘ Loan Portfolios

    Effective as of 11 January 2027, CRD VI introduces an EU-wide restriction on third-country institutions‘ cross-border lending activities. Under the new article 21c CRD VI, Swiss banks may no longer extend loans, provide guarantees, or make credit commitments to EU-domiciled borrowers without an authorized subsidiary or branch in the relevant member state. The prohibition covers all corporate finance activities with an EU nexus, including syndicated credit facilities.


  • DocMorris Finance B.V.‘s Issuance of CHF 96.8 Million Senior Guaranteed Convertible Bonds Due 2031 and Concurrent Repurchase of Outstanding Convertible Bonds Due 2028

    On 11 September 2026, DocMorris Finance B.V., a directly wholly-owned subsidiary of DocMorris AG (SIX: DOCM), successfully completed the private placement of CHF 96.8 million 1.5 per cent. senior unsecured convertible bonds due 16 March 2031, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by DocMorris AG and convertible into existing and/or newly issued registered shares of DocMorris AG. Concurrently with the new issuance, DocMorris AG completed the full repurchase of its outstanding 3.0 per cent. convertible bonds due August 2028 with a nominal amount of CHF 49.6 million through privately negotiated bilateral transactions. The repurchased bonds will be cancelled. The transaction reduced the…