Takeover
Swiss Takeover Law and Market Trends.
-
Electronic Means of Communication in Future Takeover Proceedings – Thoughts on the New Rules Proposed by the TOB on 18 August 2015
In August/September 2015, the Swiss Takeover Board (TOB) conducted a consultation proceeding on a proposed revision of the Takeover Ordinance (TOO). At its core, the revision aims at abolishing the duty to publish the offer documents in newspapers. The authors support the proposed revision for efficiency reasons. For policy reasons, the authors further advocate the…
Reference: CapLaw-2015-45 -
How to Buy a Big Block of Shares in an Ongoing Buyback Program?
In a recent decision in the matter of Schindler Holding Ltd (published on 18 October 2013), the Swiss Takeover Board approved the repurchase by Schindler of a significant block of own shares from a single shareholder during its ongoing buyback program requiring Schindler to change its buyback program at market price into a ten-day buyback…
Reference: CapLaw-2014-7 -
New Regulatory Framework for Share Buy-backs
In a far-reaching revision of the Stock Exchange Act (SESTA), which entered into force on 1 May 2013, the prohibitions of insider trading and market manipulation were moved from the Penal Code (PC) into the SESTA. As the scope of the prohibitions is very broad, the Stock Exchange Ordinance (SESTO) has been amended to include…
Reference: CapLaw-2013-28 -
The Takeover Board Applies its Practice with Respect to Reorganization Exemptions to Unfriendly Set Ups and, de facto, Rules Out Exemptions from the Offer Duty for Unsolicited Reorganizations
In a recent order the Takeover Board had to rule on whether to grant an unsolicited restructurer a reorganization exemption from the statutory duty to make a purchase offer for all shares of a listed company. The decision is of particular interest because the request for the reorganization exemption was not supported by the board…
Reference: CapLaw-2013-16 -
New Rules on Offer Consideration in Voluntary Exchange Offers
On 1 May 2013, a new set of rules governing the obligation of the bidder to offer an all cash alternative in voluntary exchange offers has come into force. The most significant change pertains to the introduction of an obligation to offer a cash alternative if the bidder purchases target shares for cash during the…
Reference: CapLaw-2013-12 -
The Repurchase of Own Shares Outside a Parallel Buyback Offer: The Decision of the Takeover Board in re Absolute Invest
The Repurchase of Own Shares Outside a Parallel Buyback Offer: The Decision of the Takeover Board in re Absolute Invest The Takeover Board is enforcing compliance of buyback programmes exempted via reporting procedure more strictly. It has used a large buyback of an investment company outside a repurchase programme to remind issuers that the fundamental…
Reference: CapLaw-2013-4 -
Takeover Board Opts-in Again Into the Opting-Out and Revives the Selective Opting-Out
Opting-out has been the most discussed topic in Swiss takeover law since its entry into force in 1998. At the core of the debate has been the question as to who should regulate the right to opt-out from the mandatory offer obligation—the civil courts, the Takeover Board or both? On 11 October 2012, the Takeover…
Reference: CapLaw-2012-53 -
Swiss Takeover Board Proposes New Rules on Offer Consideration in Qualified Voluntary Exchange Offers
On 4 May 2012, the Swiss Takeover Board has proposed a new set of rules governing the obligation of the bidder to offer an all cash alternative in qualified voluntary exchange offers. The most significant change pertains to the extension of the already restrictive rules to the twelve-month period prior to the announcement of the…
Reference: CapLaw-2012-41 -
Profit warnings, profit collapses and profit hikes
In certain situations, Swiss listed companies are required to inform the market about expected changes of their financial results. In its completely revised Commentary on the Directive on Ad hoc Publicity, SIX Exchange Regulation included a more detailed disclosure regime applicable if market expectations deviate from actually expected results. The article discusses the regime and…
Reference: CapLaw-2012-15