Between 15 May 2024 and 15 July 2024, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (FINMA) held a public consultation on a new circular on the rules of conduct under the Financial Services Act (FinSA). The circular is expected to enter into force in early 2025. This article outlines and critically evaluates some of the key aspects of the draft circular.

By Manuel Baschung / Fabrice Eckert / Philipp Klein (Reference: CapLaw-2024-34)

Under the Financial Services Act (FinSA), Switzerland has enacted comprehensive rules governing prospectus requirements for public offerings of securities. This article aims to provide a brief overview of the prospectus requirement, focusing on two specific exemptions: Article 37 (1) (g) FinSA for offerings to current or former directors, officers, or employees, and the exemption from the requirement to prepare a key information document for employee options on equity securities.

By Benjamin Leisinger (Reference: CapLaw-2023-56)

With the entry into force of the Swiss Financial Services Act (FinSA) as of 1 January 2020, new regulatory duties and requirements for Swiss and foreign financial service providers which are active in Switzerland or serve Swiss clients proactively on a cross-border basis were introduced. However, the practical application of the new law revealed that various newly introduced legal terms and concepts of the FinSA require more specific explanation and some statements made in the course of the implementation process require clarification.

The authors of this position paper are practicing lawyers working with various Zurich based law firms who regularly exchange views on new legal developments and share their experience in the application and implementation of the law. The views and positions expressed in this position paper are those of the individual contributing authors and not those of the respective law firms or other market participants.

(Reference: CapLaw-2021-30)

On 1 January 2020, the new Financial Services Act entered into effect. Certain of the transition periods are linked to the licensing of new institutions that perform relevant roles under the Financial Services Act. This article provides for an update on the current status and the end of the transition period.

By Benjamin Leisinger (Reference: CapLaw-2020-39)

The Swiss financial market regulatory framework has undergone fundamental and comprehensive reforms over the past few years. The main purpose of these reforms is to harmonize Swiss regulations with existing and new EU regulations and to ensure access of Swiss financial institutions to the European market by fulfilling equivalence requirements. The most important parts of the reform package in terms of Swiss capital markets are set out in the new Financial Services Act (FinSA) and its implementing ordinance, the Financial Services Ordinance (FinSO), both of which entered into force on 1 January 2020 (subject to the phase-in of certain provisions as well as transition periods). 

By Philippe Weber / Christina Del Vecchio (Reference: CapLaw-2020-21)

The entry in force of FinSA and the FinSO has introduced several changes to the regulation of structured products in Switzerland. Some changes appear directly in the specific rules on structured products, but most of them derive from their inclusion in the FinSA’s general framework. This article presents the new regulation of structured products as of 2020 and discusses a select handful of specific issues. 

By Jeremy Bacharach1 (Reference: CapLaw-2020-22)

In June 2018 the Swiss Federal Parliament passed the Financial Services Act and the Financial Institutions Act, and on 6 November 2019 the Swiss Federal Council published the implementing ordinances thereto. The acts and the related ordinances will become effective on 1 January 2020. Modeled largely after the EU prospectus framework, the new prospectus regime marks a veritable paradigm change to Swiss capital market regulation, introducing a number of novelties for issuers of securities in the Swiss market, such as the requirement for an ex ante approval for most financial instruments, coupled with some important long-awaited explicit exemptions from such requirement and the requirement for a prospectus for secondary public offerings.

By Christian Rehm / René Bösch (Reference: CapLaw-2019-51)

On the way to the new Financial Services Act (FinSA), the final version of the Financial Services Ordinance (FinSO), which was published on 6 November 2019, started the final countdown towards the implementation of these new regulations in the light of their entry into force on 1 January 2020. As of that date, financial services providers must, in principle, comply with the new regulations (including the key adjustments made in the final version of the FinSO). However, various transitory provisions provide for (temporary) relief from the apparent time pressure.

By Sandro Abegglen / Luca Bianchi (Reference: CapLaw-2019-52)

On 1 January 2020 the new Swiss Financial Services Act (FinSA) and its implementing ordinance, the Financial Services Ordinance (FinSO), will come into effect. The Swiss Federal Council announced its decision on the entering into force of the new financial services regulation and the final text of the implementing ordinances on 6 November 2019. There are no big surprises in the final ordinances regarding the newly introduced basic information sheet (Basisinformationsblatt). However, a number of amendments were made based on responses in the consultation process of the draft ordinances.

By Daniel Haeberli (Reference: CapLaw-2019-53)

The Financial Services Act (FinSA) as it will enter into force on 1 January 2020 contains two elements of an initially broad set of proposals meant to strengthen the enforcement of clients’ rights. First, it specifies the scope of records to be kept regarding a service provider’s relationship with a client and gives the client an unambiguous legal basis to obtain a copy of such records on request. Second, it will require all providers of financial services to be affiliated with an ombuds institution. Parliament ultimately opposed the introduction of new procedural mechanisms such as collective action instruments and changes to the ‘loser pays’ rule, referring to ongoing efforts towards a broader reform of the Civil Procedure Code.

By Thomas Werlen / Jonas Hertner (Reference: CapLaw-2019-54)